elise labott is joining us. the report says no individual was in actual breach of duty but who did the panel view as being responsible or negligent, shall we say? >> well, wolf, the panel makes a little bit of a distinction between kind of dereliction of duty and breach of duty as a league term and deficiencies in management, which clearly the panel said that senior leadership in the bureaus of diplomatic security, who is in charge of security for overseas and policy shot for the middle east were really at fault for showing a lack of leadership and, as we've been saying, a lack of understanding of the threat. we've had three resignations today at the state department, head of diplomatic security, eric boswell, his deputy charlene lamb who testified before the oversight committee and was seen in a lot of these documents to have denied repeated requests for security and also raymond maxwell, the deputy assistance secretary. and one of the recommendations of this report, while they didn't find anybody legally breac